By Mortz C. Ortigoza
I was amused hearing two radio reporters of a premier radio station talking
about two candidates for a higher office. These duo ingratiate with their
favorite politicos because they have a 15 percent commission on the air time fee they exact from any one of them.
Reporter 1: Noong sinabi ko na hindi na kukuha si ____ ng air time
napailing iyong P.R man ng kalaban. Sinabi niya sa akin: “Akala ko madami pera
iyong kabilang partido. Naka prepara na ang missile namin, kwitis lang pala ang
kaya”.
I blurted with a guffaw.
This radio station bills very expensively a buyer of its air time.
***
A seasoned politiko who was with us said that despite the projects an
elective public official had given to his constituents he should have
wherewithal to buy votes because voters who belong to the C-D-E Classes are
apathetic about the countless projects
he gave but will vote for a candidate because of his money.
“I could afford to buy even with three waves for one thousand pesos for
each of the voters,” he quipped.
He cited that a few days before the election he will test if the opponent
could reciprocate his one thousand pesos.
Who said, son of a gun, that election is a cake walk? Winning it is not
for the faint heart. One needs to spend tens if not hundred of millions of
pesos in a position that gives only a PhP100, 000 monthly pay and emoluments.
***
Many politicians and media practitioners mistook the surveys being done
at Facebook or phone patches by radio anchormen about how many voters will vote
for a certain bet and his opponent as "Gospel Truth".
These surveys, that even senatorial bets PR crowed publicly, were
not credible.
How can you say your candidate for a particular elective position be it
national or local wins when members of the popular social media founded and run
by the group of Mark Zuckerberg did not represent the electorates?
Paano naman iyong mga farmers, jeepney drivers, and even those members of
the millennial (22 to 37 years old) and the post-millennial (0 to 21 years old) who did not have Facebook account at their
android mobile phones?
Besides, FB accounts can be manipulated by candidates who can commission people to make more fake accounts and joined the survey.
The most credible polls to gauge the sentiment of the voters are those
scientific surveys done by Rasmussen Reports and Gallup Polls in the U.S and the Social Weather
Station and Pulse Asia in the Philippines.
There are provincial pollsters I know who cut their teeth on the trade by predicting the result of the election two weeks before the voters cast
their ballots or the Commission of Election declared the winners.
That was what we called “credibility” of their craft.
“Paano naman maging accurate iyang SWS and Pulse Asia e 1,200 or 1, 500
respondents all over the country ang sample nila e almost 64 million ang voters?”
I heard this common poser from skeptics.
“Paano mo naman masabi iyong isang kawang suman na niluluto ng dalawang
mama’ ay mapakla o matamis e isang kutsara lang ang pinagsample mo na ginamit
pang tikim?” my question to them, too.
Usually these pollsters use Random Sampling.
“With a total universe or
sampling frame of 1,500 respondents of voting age as distributed on weighted
averages on the target area. The poll was conducted on a Confidence Level of 98
percent on the overall design with an error margin of 2.8 percent on the
overall landscape/level and 3-5 percentage points on the local application at
the city/municipal level,” a pollster told me before.
***
Here's my take to the other critics of some surveys that say Candidate A trail
blazed Candidate B by miles because he paid millions of pesos the pollster who commissioned a survey for him.
“Kung si Candidate B ang nag
commission niyan, siya ang nag trail blaze kay Bet A,” some usual response
to those who did not understand or to those PR guys who want to pooh-pooh the "devastating" result that “chop” the head of their patron more than two months
before the election.
I told them they were wrong. Pollster ask candidates to pay for the
survey because the result will be their guide to re-strategize two months before
the D-Day.
Kung kulelat, dagdagan ang ikot. Kung kelangan magpakawala ng milyon
milyon piso sa ads dapat magpakawala, kung may pera pa matutong bumili ng mga
leaders at boto to thwart the naked truth of the polls about the candidate, o
kung kelangan pumunta sa Maynila at magsumbong ng mga alleged krimen at
kuropsiyon sa national TV stations or sa Senado para may masisira at may gumuapo, dapat
gawin, someone said.
“That’s plain stupidity to say kung kayo ang nagbayad kayo ang panalo. E
paano naman ang kredibilidad ng pollster pag iyong result ng survey niya
baliktad. Iyong nanalo sa polls niya iyon ang natalo e di apektado ang
credibility ng racket niya. Sa next 2022 election wala ng magpapa survey sa
kanya. Good bye iyong million pesos na kita niya,” I told some critics who did
not know about this sampling marvel.
If the 1,200 or 1,500 respondents say of an exit poll did not represent
the almost 64 million voters in the country, why all the presidential and
senatorial bets SWS and Pulse Asia ranked in their result were the same in the
actual counting of the Comelec?
Because, salamabit, there was an effing science on it!
Because, salamabit, there was an effing science on it!
The only exception as far as I remembered were names like Enrile (1995
election), Zubiri (2007 election), and others who were not part of the Magic 12 of
these two famous poll outfits in the exit poll who came out victorious.
The ugly reason behind? Election counting then were done manually and the insidious from either of these candidates surreptitiously sneaked thousands of fake
votes in their favor because of “Dagdag-Bawas" (add and subtract machination).
Now you got it?!
Now you got it?!
READ MY OTHER ARTICLE:
Pulse Asia is more credible than Social Weather Station
(You can read my
selected columns at http://mortzortigoza.blogspot.com and articles at
Pangasinan News Aro. You can send comments too at totomortz@yahoo.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment