By Mortz C. Ortigoza
Majority of the
businesses in the Philippines are located in Imperial Metro Manila. Thus the
monstrous traffic because people from the provinces jostled and shoved there to
get the elusive jobs that haunt the country.
According to Bureau of
Internal Revenue Region No. 6 Director Marina de Guzman, a smallest Revenue
District Office in BIR Region No. 7, where its main office she once headed is
based in Quezon City collected more than the two regional offices of the tax
agency in Northern Luzon.
 |
| Cubao, Quezon City |
“My smallest district
there had a goal of a region,” she told this writer.
She referred to the RDO
in Cubao, Quezon City that had a goal of P50 billion last year.
BIR Region No. 1, that
oversees Ilocos Norte, Ilocos Sur, La Union, and Pangasinan, had a tax
target of P17, 646,987,000.00 last year.
This year it has a tax
goal of P19.8 billion according to Revenue District Office – 3 Chief Chum dela
Torre.
Region No. 2 based in
Tuguegarao, Cagayan had a lower tax goal than BIR Region No. 1.
For this writer, the
collection of RDO in Cubao could probably surpass even if we juxtaposed BIR
Region No. 3 in Central Luzon with the two BIR Regions I mentioned.
De Guzman cited that
Pasig, the biggest RDO of BIR Region 7, had a goal of almost P100 billion last
year.
Region 7 and its nine
RDOs were tasked by the government to collect P171 billion last year.
If the P171 billion was
added with the 20 percent spike as customarily done by the national office
based in Quezon City, it could be P205 billion tax target for year 2019.
x x x x
Blame
the Filipinos’ selfishness that residents of Urdaneta City and
four towns in Pangasinan reap the consequences of their folly after the
management of a superhighway paid them a pittance.
Head Revenue Executive Assistant Beverly Milo of the Bureau of Internal Revenue told
this writer at her office in Quezon City that scheming owners want the
valuation of their land lowered in their tax declaration so they pay less real
property tax at their local government unit and capital gain tax and
others at the BIR when they sell their land.
As a
consequence, the Private Infra Development Corporation (PIDC), the owner
of the Tarlac-Pangasinan-La Union Expressway (TPLEX), bought their lands
through expropriation at P50 per square meter (PSM) despite the
improvements they have on those agricultural land cum residential.
“Basihan
iyong tax declaration. Kung tax declaration whether may improvement ka doon o
hindi siyempre ang logic diyan Filipino you want the value of the property to
be lowered”.
Many
of them protested that the price given to them by the PIDC - a subsidiary of
San Miguel Corporation - was miniscule.
Milo,
who was the former Revenue District Office-6 based in Urdaneta City, said that
a PSM of an agriculture, residential, and commercial lands vary as based on the
zonal valuation of the BIR.
“Maximum
pinaka reasonable sa agricultural P50 (PSM), commercial ang area iyan ang
nakakasama diyan kasi the area can go as high as P1,000. Residential most
probably tumatakbo siya P700 to P800”.
Milo
cited that the sellers of lands in Urdaneta and the towns of Laoac,
Binalonan, Pozorrubio and Sison were classified into two.
“Ang
nangyari kasi diyan sa TPLEX dalawa iyan. Iyong iba they agreed to sell their
properties, considered as voluntary based on the zonal valuation of the
BIR, while it is voluntary there is no need for you to go to court,” She stressed.
She said the mistakes of those sellers they did not
upgrade the classification of their lands.
“They
were not able to upgrade the classification of the lot. Even if your residence
is located within that area which is considered a part of that farmland, others
it was not classified as residential where TPLEX acquisition came in the value
of the property existing at that time is considered as agricultural”.
200 of
these landowners blocked one lane of the express way for half day in February,
creating monstrous traffic along the Pozzurobio exit because until now the
management of TPLEX did not pay their “just compensation”.
She
said that if they want the value of their land appraised higher they have to
prove to the court their evidences.
But
tax experts see these as a futile exercise as the tax declaration that identify
the property as agricultural will go against them.
READ MY OTHER ARTICLE
(Send comments to
totomortz@yahoo.com)